Monday -Friday - 9:00 - 18:00 New Zealand Time

 

GST Registration Dispute: When GST registration can be backdated

In a recent dispute involving a taxpayer's Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration, the primary issue revolved around the taxpayer's attempt to register with a backdated effective date. The taxpayer initially registered for GST in early 2021 but deregistered in mid-2021 through their agent. Later, another agent, upon realizing the taxpayer's non-registration, assisted in reapplying for GST registration. Despite several attempts, the taxpayer was ultimately registered in 2023, but the request for backdating the registration was denied by the Commissioner of Taxation (CCS).

Key Issues in the Dispute of GST Registration Backdated

The main points of contention in this case were:

  1. Voluntary Registration vs. Liability to Register: The determination of whether the taxpayer’s application for registration was voluntary or if they were liable to register for GST.

  2. Effective Date of Registration: The appropriate effective date for GST registration based on the nature of the application.

Voluntary Registration vs. Liability to Register

The crux of the dispute was whether the taxpayer's registration was voluntary or whether they were legally required to register for GST. If the registration was voluntary, the CCS's decision not to backdate the registration was deemed valid.

Taxpayer's Argument

The taxpayer argued that they should have been registered backdated to a date when they initially applied. However, they could not provide sufficient information to substantiate their claim that they were liable to be registered at that earlier date.

CC's Decision on Backdated GST Registration

The CCS concluded that the taxpayer's application for registration was voluntary because the taxpayer was not liable to be registered at the earlier date. This decision was based on the following considerations:

  • Threshold for GST Registration: If a taxpayer's taxable supplies for that month and the next eleven months surpass the $60,000 threshold, they will have reasonable grounds to be obligated to register for GST. 

  • Exempt Supplies: Supplies such as residential accommodation do not count towards this threshold.

  • Evidence of Liability: The taxpayer failed to provide adequate evidence that they were liable to be registered for GST based on their taxable supplies.

Effective Date of GST Registration

  • The effective date of GST registration is crucial as it determines when a taxpayer is required to start charging and remitting GST. The CCS's decision not to backdate the registration was based on the distinction between voluntary registration and mandatory registration:
    • Voluntary Registration: If a person voluntarily registers for GST, the Commissioner has the discretion to determine the date of registration.

    • Liability to Register: If a person is liable to register, they must do so within 21 days of becoming liable. If they register within this timeframe, the Commissioner determines the date of registration. If they register outside this timeframe, the effective date of registration is the date the person first became liable to be registered.


Conclusion on Backdated GST Registration

In conclusion, the CCS’s decision not to backdate the taxpayer's GST registration was correct based on the facts presented. The taxpayer's application was deemed voluntary due to the lack of evidence supporting their liability to register. Consequently, the CCS had the discretion to determine the effective date of registration, and their decision aligned with the relevant guidelines and regulations. This case underscores the importance of providing substantial evidence when claiming liability for GST registration and the critical nature of timely and accurate registration processes.

 

 


New Zealand Tax Accountant.